Higher interest rates
are on their way but are still too scary to talk about
An economic recovery is a timid creature that can be scared
away merely by saying the wrong thing.
That is the implication behind statements coming out of the Bank of
England which has played down the possibility of higher interest rates. The Bank of England cut interest rates to a
record low more than five years ago, but improvements in the UK economy mean
that we are nearing a time when interest rates will have to return to “normal”
levels. This may still be a fair way off
considering that the Bank of England seems to think that the subject is too frightening
to even discuss.
Why are higher
interest rates needed?
It may seem funny to talk about fears in the market at a
time when UK stocks are near record highs.
However, many of the gains over the last few years have come with the
support of central banks. Low interest
rates coupled with quantitative easing have prompted investors to dive into the
stock market in search of better returns.
The property market has also benefited with asset prices in general
booming despite the weak economy.
The hope has been that the extra wealth generated as a
result of rising asset prices would prompt people to spend more. This plan has worked to a certain extent with
consumer spending being one of the main drivers behind the economic recovery in
Britain. Yet it has also created a
problem in that a reversal in this new-found wealth will have the opposite
effect and send consumers running for cover.
This line of thought suggests that it would be great if interest rates
could be kept at the current low levels.
However, an increase is inevitable.
The main concern for any central bank is that cheap
borrowing will create excessive demand and push up inflation. Your Neighbourhood Economist has argued that these worries about inflation tend to be overblown. A more pressing
problem comes from the UK property market.
Housing prices have surged upward, recovering at a rate considerably
faster than that of the overall economy.
This suggests that such gains in property prices are likely to be unsustainable and may cause trouble in the future. This
situation is made worse by the UK government being unwilling to offer much help in stimulating the economy.
What is so scary?
The central bank is caught at a junction where the long-term
costs of low interest rates are becoming more obvious relative to the
short-term benefits. Acting too soon
could damage a still fragile recovery while problems such as the booming
property market could get out of hand if interest rates stay low for too
long. There will be a point where the
Bank of England decides that worries about a premature interest rate hike
outweigh that of the potential long-term costs but we haven’t reached that
stage yet.
The caution shown by Carney in his recent statements
suggests that the UK has yet to approach a point where higher interest rates
can even be discussed as a possibility. This
partly reflects the possible outcomes facing the Bank of England. A stalled economic recovery that results from
a hike in interest rates would be one of the most dreaded outcomes for a
central bank. On the other hand, the
effects of problems such as a housing bubble or excessive debt are only felt
years later.
Low inflation adds to the reasons why the Bank of England might
take a more cautious approach. Inflation
is not likely to cause trouble anytime soon given weak gains in wages and a
strong pound. A further factor to
consider is that the Bank of England will feel the need to forewarn both
borrowers and investors that higher interest rates are on their way. All this points to a hike to interest rates
being a bogeyman for some time to come.
It’s usually helpful to differentiate between real and nominal rates of interest. As inflation falls and nominal rates remain unchanged then the real rate of interest actually rises.
ReplyDeleteReal rates have been in negative territory for governments with large fiscal deficits. This has reduced the deficit burdens even without QE.
Borrowing rates for consumers have hardly changed. Can a reduction of 2% on a credit card A.P.R. of 20% be expected to make any impact on consumer borrowing ?
A past discussion in the Economist mentions how “ it’s hard to find a strong, empirical connection between movements in real interest rates and movements in consumption.” http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/10/are-real-rates-too-high-or-too-low
The real motivation in cutting rates was to get companies investing to increase capacity, jobs and growth. The interest rate cut has failed to have any noticeable impact in this regard. Many companies don’t need to borrow – they are sitting on piles of cash. Corporate confidence in the longer term prospects seems to be falling short regardless of what survey results tend t show. In the UK corporate confidence is probably impacted by three things:-
a) Prospects of a UK exit from the UK;
b) Or even worse the election of a Labour prime minster with Hollande like tendencies in 2015; and
c) The Scottish referendum.
Globally there is worry about climate change and yet to be determined prevention measures, Ukraine, China hard landing (does anyone really believe in any of their official statistics?).
As regards “UK stocks are near record highs.” What is the FT100 index not reported inflation adjusted terms. Adjusting for prices makes more interesting analysis and a different perspective. It would have to be way over the 9000 mark today to match the 2000 peak. http://www.aboutinflation.com/inflation-adjusted-charts/world-indices-inflation-adjusted-charts/ftse-100-index-inflation-adjusted
Thanks for your comments. There are some good points in there and I don't have much more to add.
ReplyDelete