Interest Rates – low but not low enough

Interest rates may not be low enough to get us on the road to recovery but falling prices should help

Something strange is afoot in the economy.  With interest rates at record lows in many countries, borrowing should be booming and saving on the decline but the opposite is true.  This suggests that the economy remains out of kilter without interest rates being able to set the right balance between savings and investment.  Instead, the shortfall in demand due to limited investment and weak spending may be dragging down prices as a means to put the economy back to health.  

Not so free market

The self-healing ability of any economy is one of the central tenants of economic theory.  Prices adjust as a means for the economy adapting to any changes.  For example, an increase in the supply of bananas will trigger a fall in prices and more people eating bananas.  A rise in companies looking for software experts would drive up their wages (the price for labour) and the number of people wanting to learn more about computers.  Through changes in these prices, the economy moves toward an equilibrium where everything is at appropriate levels.

Interest rates act in the same way acting as the “price of money” to make sure that there is neither too much nor too little savings or investment.  Lower interest rates are used to make borrowing cheaper and savings less worthwhile.  This was the course of action taken by central banks in order to stimulate the economy by attempting to boost investment (funded by lending) and spur on more consumption (due to lower savings).  Quantitative easing adds to this by giving banks more money to lend and less need to entice people to leave money in the bank.

Still waiting

The continued wait for a robust recovery suggests that something remains amiss.  The lack of appetite among companies to expand their operations by borrowing is both a cause of and caused by weak demand in the overall economy.  Spending by consumers is also faltering with people happy to let money mount up in the bank despite the low returns on savings.  The high levels of household debt that still persist are another reason for consumers to hold back from spending.

The persistence of the state of low investment and high savings suggests that monetary policy has not been enough to get the economy back on the right track (although it has helped to prevent a financial collapse).  A further loosening of monetary policy is not on the books for most central banks.  Interest rates cannot be lowered much further considering that negative interest rates are difficult to implement.  Quantitative easing also seems to have run its course while increasing creating negative side effects. 

Where to next?

The inability of interest rates to adjust is hampering a return to economic growth.  With interest rates not able to go any lower, it may be the case that it is prices which are instead moving to get the economy back to equilibrium.  That is, rather than interest rates falling to balance out weak lending and growing savings, prices are being depressed by the lacklustre economy.  The hopes for economic recovery rely on cheaper prices spurring on more spending thanks to consumers felling richer.  Further impetus would result from the extra spending helping to push up investment and lift the economy to better match the current level of interest rates.

This route back to recovery may take time considering that any decline in prices will be limited and wage gains have yet to take off.  There are ways to push this along of which easiest way would be for governments to temporarily increase spending.  Money used for investments in infrastructure or training and R&D in new technologies would be worthwhile at a time of low interest rates.  Another alternative would be for central banks to use their money-printing capabilities to transfer cash to consumers.  This more radical option would provide a short-term boost to spending.  Sometimes we all need a little bit extra to get us back on track and the economy is no different.

Property Market – nowhere to call home

House prices are distorted by demand from investors and governments are making the situation worse

Houses have become so much more than homes and many of us are missing out as a result.  More than just a place to live, houses have become the investment option of choice during turbulent times.  The popularity of investment properties means that buyers looking for a home are being crowded out of the market.  Rather than correcting this distortion, government policies typically make things worse and leave the dream of their own home beyond the hopes of many.

No home sweet home

The property market is never far from any topic of conversation.  Since everybody needs a place to live, it affects us all.  The substantial price tag that comes with buying a house would be enough to weigh on anyone’s mind.  But property purchases take on even greater significance as real estate also counts as a form of saving for the future.  The money tied up in property is the biggest investment that many of us make.  This means that the ups and downs of the housing market shape the financial well-being of many families. 

The predominance of property investment is further accentuated as buy-to-lets become increasingly popular as a means of putting ones wealth to work.  The abstract nature of shares and bonds along with the shenanigans in the financial markets makes property seem like the safe-as-houses option.  Yet this extra source of demand for real estate inflates house prices beyond their value as a mere place to live.  Investment in real estate brings benefits, such as providing rental accommodation and improvements to neglected properties, but the costs also mount as investment in property increases.

With a relatively fixed amount of housing in large cities, one person’s buy-to-let gets in the way of a house becoming a permanent home.  Along with the benefits to home owners, neighbourhoods also have a greater sense of community with stable residents.  The higher house prices due to property investment results in home ownership being coupled with a larger amount of mortgage debt.  This makes the property ladder more tenuous for debt-laden buyers who could easily be caught out by any economic hardship.

Need to make room for more

Governments, which could work to limit these negative consequences, tend to only exacerbate the problem.  Policies targeting the real estate market differ across countries – tax breaks for mortgage debt, low levels of capital gains tax, easier access to loans.  But the common thread is that it is all too tempting for governments to please better off voters by bolstering the property market.  The predominance of monetary policy as the main tool for managing the economy makes this even worse by stoking up borrowing (and the property market) when the economy is weak. 

While pushing up demand, governments do too little to boost supply.  It is more housing that is often cited by politicians as the solution to buoyant property prices but government regulations and zoning rules are not reflective of the growing need for new houses.  Houses take too long to build while elections are never far off even though more building would make for good economic policy at a time when the economy is still suffering from a shortfall in demand.

Financial markets are awash with other places to invest.  Our animal spirits should be limited to parts of the economy where the ups and downs can be absorbed without wider consequences for the rest of us.  Housing is too important to get caught up in such investment games.

Emerging Markets – Caught in the Crossfire

US monetary policy has missed its mark and it is a handful of emerging markets that look set to pay the price

The big guns of monetary policy used to combat sluggish economic growth are about to be put away but the real damage may be just about to kick in.  The Federal Reserve adopted loose monetary policy to get the US economy moving again but it is elsewhere where the effects have been felt the most.  Having benefited more from the loose monetary policy than the intended target, some emerging markets look set to suffer as a policy reversal prompts US investors to stage a destructive retreat back home.

Danger zone

The proverbial printing presses at central banks are like the heavy artillery of monetary policy.  Central banks such as the Federal Reserve had been pumping out cash to buy bonds as part of quantitative easing.  Yet, the US economy had failed to fire up with companies unwilling to invest while spending remains weak.  Investors with cash in hand turned their sights overseas and targeted emerging markets where economic growth was still perky. 

The surplus US dollars helped to lower interest rates for borrowers in many countries which had not gotten caught up in the global financial crisis.  The reduced borrowing costs pushed up lending elsewhere despite not having the same effects in the US economy.  The muted effects of monetary policy in the domestic economy prompted the Federal Reserve to unleash even more firepower.  Money, like some things, is fine in moderation but the bombardment of US dollars inadvertently created its own minefield. 

Borrowers in emerging market were only given access to cheap cash by borrowing in US dollars for a short period of time.  This was fine as long as the prospects for the US economy were poor and US dollars were readily available.  But any significant improvement in the US economy would see investors shift their money back.  A stronger US economy would also push up the value of the US dollar and make it tougher for overseas borrowers to pay off any debts in US dollars. 

Collateral damage

Like solider stationed in a hostile region, investors were set up to bail when the opportunity arose.  Just the mere mention by the Federal Reserve in May 2013 that quantitative easing might be coming to an end was enough to trigger a rush by investors to get their money out.  Six months of market volatility followed even though quantitative easing did not actually end until October 2014.  With the Federal Reserve now mulling lifting interest rates up from their low levels, more upheaval seems likely.

This is because money often does more damage on the way out compared to the gains when it is initially welcomed.  Yet, the lure of cheap cash is too much to ignore.  Even the financial sectors in richer countries have shown themselves to be unable to cope when too much money is on offer.  Less developed banking systems in emerging markets are often even worse at putting any cash to good use.  This increases the likelihood that many borrowers will struggle when US dollars are harder to come by. 

As the aftermath of the global financial crisis has made painfully clear, a swift end to a lending boom is not something easy to get over.  In its attempts to deal with an US economy sagging under the weight of excess debt, the Federal Reserve has inflicted the same woes on others who are less able to deal with the consequences.  Like any form of warfare, it is the innocent victims that suffer the most.

Quantitative Easing – Getting less from more

The European Central Bank has been late to try quantitative easing and may find that additional euros cannot buy much relief

We all have the tendency to rely on the tried and true tricks we have found helpful in the past even when their usefulness has faded.  This also seems true of central banks who have come to rely on quantitative easing even though its effects show signs of fading.  Even the initial boost provided by the first attempts at quantitative easing was limited and the situation has deteriorated amid its continued application.  As the last major central bank to give it a go, the European Central Bank will not get much return from any extra cash. 

Why more is not always more

Economist should know that repeating the same policies does not always work considering a well-used idea in economic theory known as diminishing returns.  This concept refers to the way in which more of the same often comes with fewer additional benefits.  Economists use this to describe why the second plate of ice cream does not taste as good as the first or why one more cook in a crowded kitchen doesn’t necessarily improve the food. 

Printing more money, which is the basis for quantitative easing, sounds like a sure-fire way to generate economic growth but any economy can only handle so much money.  The world is already awash with cash even before central banks started with quantitative easing.  This means that every additional dollar, euro, or pound printed as part of quantitative easing is being added to an already substantial pile of cash.  With money already being hoarded by many companies and governments not wanting to spend more cash, there is not much use for any more.

No need for more

With the meagre effects of quantitative easing on the wane, it was the earlier versions that would have generated the most bang for each additional buck.  It was the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England that tried out the first rounds of quantitative easing – the goal was to push investors away from government bonds to more risky investments such as corporate bonds or stocks.  The hope was that this would help provide companies with easier access to cash and to perk up investors by boosting share prices. 

Not all of the extra dollars and pounds would have stayed local but also headed overseas to find places to earn more money.  This meant that the effects of quantitative easing would have been felt far beyond the countries where the cash was originally coming from.  It has been helpful in places such as Portugal and Spain with overseas investors buying bonds issued by the Portuguese and Spanish governments as worries about Europe eased.

With the effects of quantitative easing having already spilled across international borders, there is not much more to be gained from even more cash.  As such, the additional euros coming out of the European Central Bank following the recent launch of quantitative easing in Europe may not amount to much.  Any further action may also be limited as the saga over whether or not to implement quantitative easing has highlighted how the European Central Bank only has limited room for manoeuvre when running in opposition to Germany.  Now, more than ever, it is time to try something new.

Monetary Policy – where has the magic gone?

The European Central Bank tries to cast another spell to save the Eurozone but its magic has been stolen

Monetary policy is like magic – you have to use tricks to get people into believing what you want them to believe.  Both magicians and central banks apply various devices to convince their audience that they can pull off amazing feats.  A bit of showmanship can be crucial in creating an aura of the fantastical when your powers are actually rather limited.  Central banks have pulled this off in the past but quantitative easing by the European Central Bank is more likely to show that it does not have any rabbits left to pull out of the hat.

Trying to work magic

Your Neighbourhood Economist likes to look back fondly to an era when central banks had the financial market enthralled with their mastery of all things economic.  This admiration was won the hard way in the 1980s by bringing double-digit inflation back to more manageable levels and ushering in an era where the booms and busts seemed to have past.  But central banks have been taken down a notch by their inability to revive the economy after the global financial crisis. 

Slashing of interest rates has not worked as high levels of debt meant that no one wanted to borrow. Upping the ante, central banks tried pumping money into the financial system through quantitative easing.  The effect on the actual economy due to quantitative easing also looks to be limited at a time when there is already a lot of spare cash in the financial system.  Financial markets were buoyed by quantitative easing but a side effect has been the potential for heightened volatility in the financial markets. 

With few other options seen as viable, quantitative easing has gone from an unconventional measure to the mainstay policy for central banks despite questions over its usefulness.  The European Central Bank has been slow to try its hand at quantitative easing even though the Eurozone economy was struggling more than most.  This was because Germany (who had initially done well despite its neighbours being in crisis) was firmly against the central bank in Europe printing cash to buy government bonds.  It was only after a further considerable deterioration in the prospects for the Eurozone (as well as that of Germany itself) that the European Central Bank to override this opposition.  

No more magic left

The European Central Bank has been put at a disadvantage considering that the other big central banks have already tried to work their magic through quantitative easing.  Investors are becoming harder to impress having already seen central banks pull off similar tricks.  To maintain the wow factor, quantitative easing has needed to get bigger and bigger.  The central bank in Japan pledged to double the money supply within two years but had to offer up even more cash when its initial plans proved to be lacking. 

The European Central Bank cannot compete on scale as it has to perform magic with one hand behind its back due to the political constraints within the Eurozone.  Any extra boost using the element of surprise was also dented by the protracted process as the European Central Bank and Germany squabbled publicly over quantitative easing in the months before the policy was launched. 

The fractious politics in Europe has sapped power from the central bank who had previously been the main shining light in saving the Eurozone.  Political squabbles have highlighted the limited power at the disposal of the European Central Bank.  It is like a magician who is being sabotaged by their own assistant – it will take more than magic to escape this spell.

Fiscal Policy – Not fighting back

The government has been subdued in the fight to revive the economy despite a change in strategy being long overdue

Considering the trouble we are having fighting back against the aftermath of the financial crisis, it seems strange that the government is not using its full arsenal.  Central banks have come out all guns blazing with their monetary policy but governments have held back from firing up fiscal policy.  Worries about their levels of debt were behind this tepid response by governments but such concerns have eased while the economic recovery struggles to pick up momentum.  Why should be suffer further losses while saving our ammunition?

Hit and miss

Central banks launched themselves into the front line while governments remained in the background due to self-inflicted wounds.  Monetary policy had been enough to deal with past recessions and resulted in a belief that central banks were infallible in this regard.  High levels of debt along with a banking sector under attack meant that low interest rates had little effect and quantitative easing was not much better.  Along with not making much headway, monetary policy also caused considerable collateral damage in the form of financial instability.  This was a sign that central banks were being asked to do too much in the face of a once-in-a generation economic slump.

Most governments were happy to sit back having mismanaged their finances resulting in high levels of government debt prior to the crisis.  The Eurozone crisis prompted governments to further retreat amid worries that investors would shun any government with too much debt.  This pushed governments off on a trajectory of austerity which continued even though fears about government debt abated within several months.  The economic recovery has been muted due to weak demand with companies not willing to invest despite low interest rates and consumers hurting due to large debts and stagnating wages.

Time for a new battle plan

Monetary policy was always likely to struggle to make much ground while there is little impetus to spend, let alone borrow.  This shortfall could be overcome by the government which fixes problems, from crime to pollution, that are caused by others.  Keeping the economy ticking over when spending would otherwise be weak would prevent more damage being done to the economy.  Otherwise, the economy becomes less productive as firms stop investing in new technologies and the skills of people out of work deteriorate.

It seems an even more obvious solution at a time when there is so much that the government could spend its money on such as improving Internet access, accelerating the uptake of renewable energy, and updating transport infrastructure.  The low interest rates provide the perfect opportunity to invest for the future especially when companies are not up to doing so.  Investment projects could be set up to boost output in the economy for a few years until spending from other picks up the slack. 

A winning strategy

Despite the still faltering economic recovery, governments loathe changing direction and austerity continues to reign in Europe and the UK (as well as US to a lesser extent).  Moves to fix government finances made sense following the jump in interest rates on government debt in the Eurozone but this turmoil in the financial markets has long passed.  Weak overall spending and the threat of deflation setting in is now the dominant problem facing many countries. 

Higher spending by the government that lifted the productivity of the economy could be funded through borrowing at low interest rates and repaid through higher taxes that a more efficient economy would generate.  This is the opposite of what is happening in the UK where austerity is hurting the economy and efforts to reduce the government deficit are being thwarted due to a fall in money from taxes. 

There is still time for a change of strategy to have an impact in the fight for an economy recovery that improves the lives of us all.  Even if it is too late, investing for the future when interest rates are at record lows seems like a no brainer.  A change is due as this is a battle that no one wants to lose.

Inflation – Hard to ignore again

Low inflation is a nuisance for central banks looking to increase interest rates but they would be wrong to dismiss it

Family get-togethers over Christmas often involve naughty children but it is inflation that is making trouble for central banks.  Inflation unexpectedly shot up in the aftermath of the global financial crisis but is now surprisingly falling despite a burgeoning economic recovery.  Central banks ignored the jump in inflation in 2011 and are now stuck figuring out how to deal with persistently low inflation.  The antics of inflation will be difficult to disregard a second time around considering that the causes for static prices are not all external.

Inflation acting up

The level of inflation is used as a measure to check whether all is well with the economy.  There should neither be too much inflation (suggesting an overheating economy) nor too little (which is a sign of weak overall demand).  With countries increasing sourcing goods from overseas, prices levels in any country can be influenced by prices of commodities on global markets.  This can push inflation in a different direction to the particular circumstances of any economy.

The best recent example of this was a plague of high inflation in 2011 when the economies of many countries were still in the doldrums.  The Chinese economy was still humming along despite financial turmoil elsewhere and China continued to buy up commodities on the global markets.  The result higher prices were most prominent in the UK where inflation topped five percent in 2011.  This bout of inflation was not just a brief spike with prices rising by more than four percent for over a year.  Despite inflation being well above its target of two percent, the Bank of England maintained its loose monetary policy to support the weak economy.  The argument behind this was that the inflation was temporary and not related to the underlying economy. 

Behaving badly again

Inflation is currently misbehaving in a different way and is causing concern due to being too low.  Prices are not rising by much due to lower commodity prices with the spurt of growth in emerging countries having run its course.  While this is a positive for consumers who benefit from a boost in spending power, low inflation is a source of anxiety for central banks.  The Federal Reserve and the Bank of England are getting set to increase interest rates to more normal levels.  Even the prospect of the economic recovery gaining further momentum would not provide central banks with enough of a reason for higher interest rates when inflation is around one percent. 

This irritation is not likely to go away anytime soon if the high inflation in 2011 is any guide.  Inflation is likely to slip even lower in 2015 as the effects of the plunging price for oil feeds through into the economy.  On top of this, swings in commodity prices tend to last for a few years so that inflation is unlikely to pick up for the next couple of years.  This would suggest that inflation will be below target for 2015 and 2016 which is the two-year time frame that central banks look at when deciding interest rates. 

Ignoring inflation would be naughty

Low inflation should imply low interest rates but central banks could choose to ignore this and raise interest rates away.  This is because the same argument as in 2011 could be applied – disregarding trends in inflation that are attributed to outside sources.  It is a convenient strategy for central banks worried about the economic recovery triggering a jump in inflation due to the potential for wages to rise as unemployment falls.  Such an outcome does seem optimistic considering that wages are not budging by much even as the economy picks up steam.

A further problem with turning a blind eye to inflation is that it is tough to gauge what the inflation level would be without the fall in commodity prices.  It is not as if consumers have money to spurge having been stuck with stagnating wages and considerable debts from the pre-financial crisis spend-up.  Sluggish prices are harder to dismiss considering that low inflation is also caused by weak domestic demand.  With inflation likely to continue to play up for a while yet, central banks will need to be patient and bide their time before raising interest rates or else it will be the central banks that may be the ones getting into trouble.

Bargain Low Interest Rates to Continue in 2015

Borrowing is likely to stay cheap in 2015 as a drop in inflation puts pay to talk of higher interest rates

Christmas is usually followed by a rush off to the sales but borrowers need not hurry as cut-price loans are likely to remain for most, if not all, of 2015.  Acting like retailers with surplus stock to sell after Christmas, central banks slashed interest rates after the global financial crisis.  Six years later, there are growing calls for this to be reversed in countries such as the US and the UK due to as a strengthening economic recovery backed by more people finding jobs.  Yet, plans for higher interest rates have been way laid with falling inflation suggesting that all is not well with the economy.  With unemployment and inflation likely to fall further in 2015, there seems to be few reasons for any changes to be made to interest rates over the next 12 months.

Shopping around

The Federal Reserve and the Bank of England are in the midst of a dilemma – like a shopper not sure of where to head first to snap up some bargains after Christmas.  Unemployment data suggests that the economic recovery is becoming more entrenched with the proportion of Americans and Brits without jobs now below 6%.  Yet, despite more workers being hired, companies are still holding back from investing to expand output.  Aggregate demand is also suffering due to cuts to government spending resulting in an economic recovery that is still patchy.

If the stuttering economy is giving central banks reason to worry, it is inflation that is the real sticking point getting in the way of higher interest rates.  The extent at which prices are rising (or falling) has been adopted by central banks as a gauge for the health of the economy.  It is thus a point of frustration that inflation is heading downward as other signs, such as lower unemployment, suggest that the economy is picking up.  These mixed signals from the economy mean that Federal Reserve and the Bank of England are caught in two minds in terms of what do to with interest rates.

Best to stay put

Things are not likely to get any easier for central banks considering that the trends in unemployment and inflation are not likely to change any time soon.  With companies not yet willing to spend big on new equipment, it makes sense to employ more workers (who are relatively cheap) to get things done.  Lower commodity prices is the main cause behind falling inflation and a rebound in commodity markets is not likely as shifts in demand and supply of commodities taking years to change.  Neither are consumers in any mood for higher prices considering that wages have not kept up with inflation over the past few years. 

All this suggests that 2015 will be more of the same and interest rates are also unlikely to change.  Some will argue that interest rates need to rise to give central banks leeway to act in case of other threats to the economy.  Others will claim that the economic recovery means that inflation will be just around the corner and central banks need to pre-empt any jumps in prices.  But these are risky strategies considering that a bit of inflation in the future will do less damage to the economy than a premature hike in interest rates. 

A still fragile recovery means that, like any shopper out after Christmas, the economy could also do with a bargain (in the form of low interest rates).

Getting more from Monetary Policy

Japan has made lots of mistakes and it is time that Europe learnt from them

We can all learn from watching others make mistakes and the experiences of Japan continue to provide valuable lessons.  Japan has stumbled into another recession following a hike in taxes to fix the government’s finances.  The other key policy doing the rounds in Japan, using expansive monetary policy to put an end to deflation, also seems to be flagging.  It is Europe that has most to learn from the unfortunate trials and tribulations in Japan since many of the same problems are shared by both.  What should Europe do to avoid making the same mistakes and decades of stagnation?

Following in the same footsteps

Japan has been hit first with many of the same problems that are increasingly expected to plague Europe and other Western countries.  For starters, new-borns in Japan are increasingly outnumbered by pensioners which have pushed the population into decline in recent years with an aversion to immigration further accentuating this trend.  This translates to fewer workers to provide the taxes needed for the rising costs involved with taking care of old people.  The situation is made worse by government debt which is already more than double GDP due to years of inefficient government spending.

Japanese consumer prices have been falling for years as a reflection of the weak demand.  There are few opportunities to profit from in Japan due to the falling population and even Japanese firms are looking elsewhere to invest.  Weak global demand means that even one of Japan’s strengths, exporting, offers only limited respite even with a weaker yen due to its loose monetary policy.  All of this means that the Japanese economy itself is like a tottery pensioner - even a small rise of sales tax from 5% to 8% was enough to push Japan back into recession.  This does not bode well for Europe where the economy is sputtering along due to many of the same problems while the governments there are also trying to get a grip on their finances.

Trying different directions

Having been stuck with these problems for longer, policy makers in Japan are increasingly more aggressive in coming up with solutions.  The current prime minister, Shinzo Abe, launched a raft of new measures dominated by a massive expansion of the money supply to target falling prices.  This new aggressive approach to monetary policy was facilitated by the government installing a new governor to the Bank of Japan who was willing to give up its independence and toe the line.

This is the complete opposite to the situation in Europe.  The head of the European Central Bank is eager to do more with monetary policy but is prevented from doing so by the German government.  German politicians want to reforms to come first due to an expectation that their neighbours will not implement the necessary policies. Whereas, in Japan, the aim was to use the loose monetary policy to help build momentum that will allow the government to implement reforms. 

Yet, the Abe government has been disappointing in its reform efforts (as Your Neighbourhood Economist predicted) and this will bolster the stance taken by Germany.  With the Bank of Japan finding it tough to generate sufficient inflation despite a rapidly expanding money supply through quantitative easing, many will question about the reasons behind using a similar policy in Europe.  Central banks are struggling to have much influence in a world that is already awash with surplus cash.  

Time for Plan C

It seems like the key lesson from Japan is that monetary policy cannot do much by itself.  Japan still languishes despite the best efforts of the central bank as the Abe government shirks the much needed measures to free up the economy.  Yet, bullying countries in Europe to reform by withholding the full extent of monetary policy is not helpful either.  A grand bargain marrying reforms with looser monetary policy, as was supposed to be the case in Japan, seems the obvious solution. 

This takes more political willpower when the many countries of Europe are involved but is not something beyond the realms of possibility.  Ironically, the chances for such a deal may be improving as deflation becomes more of a concerns and the economic stagnation in Europe also spreads to Germany.  Japan has already paid the price for years of economic mismanagement – there is no reason for Europe to do the same.

Commodity Prices – Swings and Roundabouts

Commodity markets had gone off in their own direction but are now back on track to help out with the global economy

The global economy has suffered more downs than ups over the past few years but lower commodity prices will provide some long needed cheer.  Long after the onset of the global financial crisis, prices for everything from copper to vegetable oil continued to rise stoked by demand from places such as China.  Weaken global demand has finally taken affect and relief in on the way for consumers everywhere.  It is likely to provide a bigger boost than just a bit of extra cash.

A guide to the road ahead

Commodity markets often follow their own roadmap.  Demand for different materials can rise and fall depending on changes in technology or consumption patterns.  The rising wealth of China and India has pushed up prices for everything from gold to milk powder.  New fracking technology has lowered the price of oil while corn became more expensive due to its use in producing ethanol in the United States. 

Supply further complicates matters as rising demand for any commodity will prompt companies to increase output but this often takes time.  There is a lag of a year or so for farmers to shift from growing one crop to another and even longer for a new mine or source of oil to be developed.  The changing demand and the delayed response on the supply side means that twists and turns in the commodity markets are often accentuated.

Back on the map

Prices in the commodity markets had long been out of kilter with the slump in global demand but this seems to be over.  The price of oil, which has been making news recently, is indicative of this new trend.  Increased output in the US coupled with a tailing off of demand from energy-hungry China has resulted in a sharp turnaround in prices.  High prices for commodities such as oil often do not last as more money gets spend on both finding more oil as well as on increasing energy efficiency to lower money spent on oil.  Both of these factors act to stop the price of oil getting out of hand. 

Market correcting forces move in both directions and also work to prevent excessive falls in prices.  Investments in producing commodities are put on hold if prices drop back and low supply tempers a decline in prices.  Lower prices also mean that interest in using resource more efficiently tends to fade.  This is why commodity prices tend to fluctuate in big swings of boom and bust.  With the world economy have just endured a period of high prices, the commodity market seems to be swinging in the opposite direction.  Considering the big swings in commodity prices, this trend is not likely to be reversed any time soon. 

Heading in the right direction

The benefits of lower commodity prices extend beyond the obvious effects of cheaper prices at the petrol pump, on our gas and power bills, and when stocking up at the supermarket.  Less money will go to places such as Saudi Arabia and Russia, where high oil prices only add to the riches of already wealthy individuals, and consumers across the globe will instead have more money in their pockets.  As such, the global economy will benefit as this extra cash will likely to spent rather than piling up in the bank accounts of rich Saudis or Russians.

A further benefit of lower commodity prices is that cheaper commodities mean lower inflation and lower inflation allows more scope for looser monetary policy.  An uptick in inflation would be one excuse that central banks would use to raise interest rates.  But with inflation likely to be subdued (and deflation becoming more of a concern), interest rates are more likely to stay at their current low levels or hardly rise at all when interest rates are eventually raised.  The absence of inflation could even result in a long-needed rethink of what central banks should be doing in terms of monetary policy.  That may work out to be even be more valuable than a few extra notes in your pocket.

Interest Rates – Looking for the right temperature

The economic climate is changing but that may not necessarily mean that interest rates have to change too

Setting interest rates can be as frustrating as fiddling with the heating as the seasons change.  We can rely on the weather forecast as a guide to the outside conditions but it is harder to get a measure of whether the economy is running hot or cold.  This is particularly tricky at a time when some central banks are switching from policies to warm up the economy to measures for preventing the economy from overheating.  The poor economic outlook suggests that the current monetary policy measures may be here to stay despite calls for higher interest rates.

Neither too hot nor too cold

Interest rates are often raised or lowered to nudge the economy toward what is seen as an appropriate rate of growth.  Once the economy is humming along as it should (with inflation in check), interest rates are ideally set to a level that neither helps nor hinders economic growth.  This is the concept of neutral interest rates which should be higher for fast growing economies and lower for economies with weaker growth.  Not only are there differences between countries but the neutral interest rate for one particular country can change over time.

The neutral interest rates have been slipping downward for many countries as their prospects for growth deteriorate.  Many consumers as well as governments are focusing on paying back debt leaving less money to spend.  Companies are hoarding cash instead of investing which takes away another driver of growth.  With most developed countries suffering from the same problems, exports don’t offer much help either.  Even economic growth in China, which has been one of the few bright spots in the global economy, is likely to slow from a boil to a simmer as focus shifts from investment to consumption.

Turning up the heat

There are signs that the global economy is heating up in places.  The British economy is expected to expand by around 3.0% in 2014 while around 2.0% growth is forecast for the US economy.  Yet, the effects of this are not being felt by consumers due to stagnating wages and cuts to government spending.  Low inflation is a further indication that not all is well even these economic hot spots.  These mixed signals have prompted a cautious approach by the US Federal Reserve and the Bank of England who have kept interest rates at record lows close to zero.

The lingering hangover from the global financial crisis continues to hold back the economic recovery.  Consumers are less willing to take on debt after the disastrous results of the previous borrowing binge.  Any plans of investment are reigned amid worried about the prospects for the economy.  Proactive policies tend to go out the window as politics regresses to squabbling over limited government resources.   The likelihood for these factors to lower the neutral interest rates means that interest rates are unlikely to go up by much at all. 

Don’t touch that knob

Depending on the extent to which the neutral interest rates have fallen, it could even be argued that interest rates should stay close to zero until the medium term prospects improve.  There is no immediate reason for interest rates to be raised considering that the main concern of central banks, inflation, is not a concern.  Even looking forward, inflation is likely to remain subdued when factoring in falling commodity prices and weak wage growth.

Moreover, lending has not gotten out of hand except for in isolated sectors such as real estate in certain countries (such as the UK).  Other worries also include low rates of return pushing investors to chase after higher pay-outs by putting money into increasingly riskier investments.   Yet, these issues can be dealt with using targeted policies rather than relying solely on interest rates.  Higher interest rates are seen as helpful in that it will give central banks more capacity to respond in the case of another downturn.  But setting interest rates has less of an effect when the financial markets are awash with cash. 

Like a bickering couple arguing whether the heating is set too high or too low, expect the debate over the right level for interest rates to drag on.  Despite all this, it looks as if interest rates might be best left where they are for now.

Question – where next for Japan

An inquiry from a reader prompts Your Neighbourhood Economist to look into the prospects for Japan

There has been another knock at the door of Your Neighbourhood Economist, with a reader what I thought Japan should be doing in the short and medium term?  The question arrived just days before another big policy development in Japan with the central bank ramping up its monetary policy.  This is the latest attempt by policy makers in Japan to resurrect an economy that has been languishing for decades.  To get an idea of what Japan should be doing, we need to start with what went wrong and why Japan has not made much progress.

What is not going right?

Japan got itself into trouble in the 1980s with the spectacular collapse of a financial bubble from which it has never recovered.  Property prices have fallen almost every year for two decades while prices for consumer goods have been inching lower for almost as long.  Japan has repeatedly tried to use fiscal stimulus but higher government spending has been unable to mask deeper problems with the economy.  Along with numerous roads and bridges which are hardly used, the main result of these rescue attempts has been a ballooning amount of government debt which only adds to Japan’s woes.

Monetary policy has been adopted recently as the potential saviour in the fight against what has been deemed as the main problem – deflation.  Falling prices were seen as prompting consumers to hold off spending and preventing companies from investing.  With this in mind, the central bank in Japan announced plans to double the money supply in early 2013.  But the policy of pumping more money into the economy was based on the false logic that deflation was a problem rather than just the symptom of a weak economy.  Instead, it is likely the case that deflation persists because prices rises had gotten out of hand in the past and need to fall back to appropriate levels.

Fix-up job not working

The result of this monetary policy has been as Your Neighbourhood Economist might have expected with just a brief and temporary boost to inflation.  Prices for consumer goods cannot rise consistently if consumers themselves do not get a similar rise in pay.  Higher wages in Japan seem unlikely as a declining population hurts aggregate demand and Japanese firms invest more overseas than domestically.  Yet, rather than change tact, Japan’s central bank has opted for more of the same. 

This involves the Bank of Japan aiming for an even larger boost to the money supply in Japan with annual purchases of 80 trillion yen (US$720 billion or £450 billion) in government bonds.  The timing of the new policy comes as the Japanese economy is faltering under the added weight of a tax hike designed to fix the government’s finances.  Japan has gotten itself deeper and deeper into trouble and seems likely to be an example of what not to do in terms of fiscal and monetary policy.   

Where to from here

The best option left to the Japanese government is to reform the economy so as to increase competition and improve efficiency.  There is substantial domestic opposition to reforms even within the current government headed by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe who included reforms as one of his key policies.  An easy way to sidestep domestic politics would be to jump on-board to plans for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).  This is a free trade agreement with the United States, Australia, Mexico, Chile, and other countries around the Pacific Rim.

Left to themselves, Japan will probably continue to stagnated due to the stifling effects of its consensus style of politics which make it tough to come up with reforms that keep everyone happy.  As such, Japan has a history of positive change only coming when imposed from the outside and this free trade agreement looks likely to follow this trend.  Greater competition from foreigners will help lower costs of business and create impetus for freeing up businesses in Japan from a host of restricting rules.  Facing up to the outside world looks like the best way to inject life back into a Japanese economy that has been slowly decaying for years.

Monetary Policy – Germany to feel the pinch

A taste of its own medicine may prompt Germany to rethink its tough guy approach to Europe

No one like a bully but that seems to be Germany’s role in Europe.  It makes other countries walk the line in policy terms (for their own good) even amid simmering discontent among its neighbours.  Germany has been mean in terms of pushing for monetary policy to be less expansive as elsewhere in spite of struggling countries needing help.  Yet, things may change as the German economy is starting to suffer from similar problems to those it bullies.  Germany is likely to be stuck with monetary policy that is too harsh for even its own economy and this may result in it softening up its approach to others in Europe.

Help wanted

It is a given that the economy in Europe could do with a boost.  Weak demand from consumers and firms means that unemployment remains stubbornly high and inflation for Europe as a whole is not far off zero.  But Germany continues to push its policy of tough love onto Europe.  As with most other developed countries, fiscal stimulus is not an option as governments deal with high levels of public debt.  Germany has gone further in cajoling other governments in Europe to sort out their budget deficits despite the likelihood of adverse economic effects.  

Germany has also not allowed the use of monetary policy as an alternative means of stimulating the economy.  Measures such as quantitative easing have been utilised with some benefits in the US and in Britain but not in Europe even though Europe needs a boost more than anywhere else.  The reasoning behind this approach by Germany is that, by offer laggards in Europe an easy way out, the current problems which are holding them (and Europe as a whole) back will remain in place.  As a result, the European Central Bank has had to be creative and try other measures such as negative interest rates.  But it is difficult for monetary policy to have much effect when its scope is limited.

Turning the tables

Germany may have been able to bully others in Europe but it may be the Germans turn to feel the pain.  The German economy is beginning to flag amid weakening demand for its exports from places such as China.  Forecasts for economic growth in Germany are being cut as its prospects deteriorate while inflation has fallen to below 1%.  The normal response to a weakening economy anywhere else would be for looser monetary policy.  But having not allowed other European countries this option, Germany’s tough stance on others may result it also being tough on itself. 

It is funny to think that the Germans would have likely allowed itself to have more stimulus via monetary policy if there was just a German central bank looking after just the German economy.  But its own actions in influencing monetary policy will mean that Germany may have to endure monetary policy that does not reflect the weak state of its economy (along with most everyone else in Europe).  When framed in this way, Germany must rethink its ideas on economic policy for Europe if just for its own good. 

Continued stubbornness by the Germans would be unconstructive even in comparison to the often dysfunctional politics in Europe.  Deflation is another concern that will only get worse with the current policy measures.  Germany was never going to go easy on others in Europe while its economy was riding high.  It is only a Germany that has been laid low that may soften up and be more willing to help itself by helping others.

Euro as the new Deutsche Mark

Germany practically controls the euro as if it were its own currency but it would gain more being less in charge

Being a big fish in a small pond can have its benefits as Germany is discovering in its dealing with Europe.  Its powerhouse economy means that Germany was one of the few countries left standing after the Eurozone crisis.  Germany has used this position of strength to turn the euro into its own de-facto currency.  It dominates the decisions over monetary policy and has influences spending decisions by politicians outside of its borders.  This level of control is alienating many others in Europe while still being insufficient to keep Germans happy.  As a result, more could be gained by Germany trading away its power to secure a brighter future for Europe as a whole.

Benefits of being the boss

Control over monetary policy is not something that Germany fought for but it came as a by-product of the Eurozone crisis that hobbled the other powers in Europe.  More prudent management of government finances meant that the government has less debt and the economy has been resilient due in part to its exporting prowess.  This left its Chancellor, Angela Merkel, as one of the few politicians who is backed by voters and in a strong position to dominate European politics.

It has allowed Germany to impose its own policy measures over the Eurozone.  Germany has set the tone regarding austerity as well as its concerns over inflation limiting the scope of monetary policy.  Countries such as Spain and Italy would benefit in the short term from more government spending and looser monetary policy.  But Germany has pushed for a range of policies which are a better fit for its own economy than others in Europe where the shortfall in demand is more pronounced.  The aim is to bring others into line in terms of implementing reforms which would improve the outlook for Europe in the future.

Along with setting policies, being the boss of a widely used currency comes with a host of benefits.  For starters, investors looking for the safest place to park their euros will choose Germany over other European countries and this keep down interest rates in Germany.  Worries about a sluggish economy in Europe are a further boost to Germany by keeping the value of the euro weak.  The euro is both too strong considering the economic circumstances of many of the countries in Europe but considerably below what a truly German currency (a new Deutsche Mark) could be valued at. 

Getting more from less

As is often the case, its power has become like a poisoned chalice.  Not only is Germany out of tune with many of its neighbours but the euro is also increasingly unpopular at home.  The rapid rise of an anti-euro party in Germany (called the Alternative for Germany party) suggests that there are many Germans who feel as if they are getting a raw deal from being part of the Eurozone.  This party joins a growing list of populist parties in Europe worried about the level of integration needed to maintain the euro. 

If a position of strength does not come with many rewards, sometimes more can be gained from giving power away.  Germany could soften its strict stance on fiscal and monetary policy as a trade for more reforms in other countries.  This bargain would help deal with the short-term issues of a weak economy needing stimulus as well as concerns about the prospects for Europe over the long term.  Compromise also seems more likely now that deflation is a growing threat and the German economy itself is flagging.  It is time for Germany to cash in now as it may be too late if the situation in Europe gets worse. 

Europe – finding a way out

Europe seems trapped with a sluggish economy but a way out may be close

Getting out of a hole that you have dug for yourself can be tough.  This is what Europe is struggling with as the Eurozone crisis seems to have passed only to be replaced with a slow strangling at the hands of deflation.  Infighting among politicians about the best way to deal with the economic stagnation in Europe has resulted in few reasons for hope of an escape.  Yet, this may change due to recent developments such as a flagging German economy and the rise of reform-minded governments in some countries.  Sometimes things need to get worse before a way out is possible and the situation in Europe may have finally got bad enough for positive change to occur.

An economic escape route…

An economic recovery is typically an automatic progress but may not always be easy.  Companies going bankrupt and workers losing their jobs cause considerable pain but is actually something that is good for the overall health of the economy.  A cull of weaker businesses provides more space for more successful firms to grow and prosper.  This process has the label of “creative destruction” in economic theory due to the idea of the old needing to give way for the new. 

In this way, economic growth returns after a recession as resources such as workers move to more productive uses.  The economy can grow faster as a result but a certain level of economic freedoms are needed to allow this to happen.  In this way, there is a trade-off between economic growth and the potential for instability.  It is not possible to have the former without the latter but any instability can be limited through controlling economic excesses (which often show up in the financial system).

Getting the balance right is not easy.  Companies in finance have been given too much leeway and created havoc as a result.  Yet, in other areas, businesses have been burdened with too many rules.  One example is regulation which makes it difficult for firms to fire workers.  This may seem like a good way of keeping people in jobs but such regulation has an adverse effect in that companies will not want to take on new workers if their employment is almost permanent.

… and the politics to make it happen

Many countries in Europe are in desperate need of policies to free up business from such regulation but implementation is often tricky.  At a time of rapid change, voters often crave stability of bygone eras that are no longer viable.  This does not stop populist parties making false promises to turn back time and dismissing the need for reforms.  It is heartening for the outlook in Europe that some countries such as Spain have made progress with its reforms.  Others such as France and Italy also have governments that are making the right noises in terms of reforms even if not actually putting new policies in place.

The lack of reforms has been preventing the recovery in Europe in other ways.  Germany, who has a firm grip on the reins of power in Europe, has stubbornly refused to offer much help to struggling European countries.  The reasoning behind this is that offering an easy way out would mean that these countries would not deal with the problems within their own economies.  The flip side is that, once reforms begin, Germany may be more accommodating in providing support. 

This opens up the possibility of a grand bargain, such as reforms as a trade for looser monetary policy and less focus on austerity.  More action from the central bank seems likely as the German economy is beginning to falter and genuine fears about deflation in Europe grow.  Its own weak economic growth and low inflation will highlight to the Germans that the problems are plaguing Europe as a whole rather than just individual problem countries.

Your Neighbourhood Economist penned this posting with comments from readers in mind.  Europe and the euro was seen as a lost cause by one reader while others have been annoyed that this blog always had to be so pessimistic.  Hopefully, this post will hopefully prove them wrong (but in a good way).